Tuesday, May 21, 2013

End of Year Wrap-up

Even though I consider us year round schoolers, we do have a definite end to our year just like we have a start to our new one (lately that's been in July and it works for us).

Following along behind Jessica and Sarah, I'm going to put down here what worked and what didn't so that I can remind myself of it in a couple of years.
School goes better with coffee!

High School

First off, the biggest miss... Kolbe Academy High School. You know, I love what they offer and I love that they are a classical curriculum, but two epic poems and one greek tragedy into his freshman literature and The Professor was ready to move on from the Greeks. We won't even talk about the reading material from Herodotus that would have totally scandalized and grossed out my very innocent young man. (My husband, a history major, hadn't even read this Herodotus!) Mind you, he really enjoyed studying The Iliad and The Odyssey! I had him read just Antigone, instead of the whole Oresteia, because this drama major mama can pull rank like that if she feels like it! But when presented with the option to move on to The Aeneid or read Richard III, he opted for the Shakepeare, which he loved so much, it kind of scares me. It might have been because this whole mystery was unfolding before his eyes as he read it. He finished up the year with reading Murder in the Cathedral because it kind of seemed to fit with our eclectic "tragic theme" for the year. Anyway, all of this is to say that Kolbe is a wonderful, classical education, but it's just not for him. My son prefers to have more flexibility and variety and I'm OK with that.

And speaking of high school...this year's biggest hit...  Lukeion Latin I! He has taken some Lukeion grammar classes before and some of their workshops. They are pricey (about the same as most online classes) but incredibly worth it! The couple who runs it are amazing teachers and encouragers. He took the National Latin Exam and earned a gold medal which is proudly displayed in his room. When he said he wanted to study Latin, I thought maybe it was a passing fancy, but if it was, this year has helped incite his passion for it and cement that in his heart. He loves picking out Latin words or Latin roots from things he reads and looks forward to earning more medals learning more.
Cleaning off the school shelves makes them neat and tidy but everything else... not so much!

Hits and misses for the middle school set

{This post includes affiliate links, but you probably already knew that…}

For my girls, we decided to do some practical grammar this year. They've done more intensive grammar in the past and needed a little break this year. We used two different resources Great Editing Adventure and Hot Fudge Monday: Tasty Ways to Teach Parts of Speech to Students Who Have a Hard Time Swallowing Anything to Do With Grammar. Doesn't that title alone sound like fun? My girls had a lot of fun with that last one. It was filled with so many fun writing prompts that we counted it as writing too! That's right... a two for one curriculum! Woot!

Definite Miss: Apologia Science (Exploring Creation Series)
We started with Exploring Creation With Botany a few years ago and the girls enjoyed it. They really loved using the notebooks with all the mini-books and stuff. They did it mostly on their own with very little help from me. But the one thing they didn't like was the Young Earth Creationist approach. As Catholics, we aren't afraid that science is going to prove our faith wrong. In the Botany book, it was easy to skip over. But then we moved on to the Zoology books and it became harder to stomach. This year, we used the Astronomy book and just couldn't take it anymore. The YEC agenda was really heavy handed and sprinkled throughout, not just in neat little sections that were easily skipped. We plowed through it and ended up using many, many supplements. I'm thinking I might save the Botany book for BigBoy, maybe the Swimming Creatures, because he loves the ocean, but really, I'm hoping to find something better. The best option I've found so far is Behold and See from CHC. They are up-to-date, visually engaging and totally Catholic. The 6th grade book even lists a UD professor as one of the contributing scientists! Woot! And even though it's a grade level behind my girls, we need an easy science year next year because we are making the switch to a more intensive math program, which leads me to...

The Biggest Miss... Teaching Textbooks. Sigh. I am so disappointed! But I guess, as the saying goes, if something seems too good to be true, it probably is. My younger three averaged 93, 96 and 99 at the end of this year but then bombed several different end of year tests and placement tests in other programs. And it seems to get worse the longer they use the program. Sadly, this was not the first time we'd heard of this phenomenon. A friend of mine didn't make this discovery until her oldest bombed the PSAT. Now, is it a program that can be beneficial to some? I'm sure it is, especially in a survival year whether illness or babies or job difficulties make it difficult to do any math at all. TT is definitely better than no math at all, but I have a philosophical problem with a program where children get wonderfully high grades with very little effort but then that doesn't translate to any other math program around. Huh? So, we are switching to Saxon for everyone. The Professor has already been using it this past year and with the Saxon Teacher CD's, I think it's very doable. We ended up using them much more than the DIVE CD's. They are very different from the DIVE CD's, in fact, they kind of are like the less flashy, less colorful, less animated version of the TT formula for Saxon. You hear a nice lady's voice on the screen and she goes over each lesson. That's the lecture. My son preferred to read it from his book instead so we usually don't watch the lecture on the computer but it's there if you want it. From there, you can jump to any problem in the lesson and see it worked out for you. The writing pops up on the computer screen and the nice lady's voice explains what she's doing, kind of like those overhead projector lessons I remember from school.  It's not flashy, it doesn't keep the grades for you, but it's like having a tutor right there to show your child exactly how to work the problem they got wrong which is often enough what they need to figure out what they did wrong. As a final note, to anyone who is sticking with TT, I highly recommend you get your kids at least 2 years ahead of grade level if you want them to be doing comparable work to other math programs.

Last Hit... The Phonetic Zoo. We've actually been using this with our girls for years now. They were not natural spellers and needed lots of reinforcement. They made it all the way up to Level C which is technically for high school so I gave them a break from it this past year. I had them use the same formula as The Zoo but with my own lists for them this year. BigBoy started using the Phonetic Zoo formula with lists of words that I made for him based on the recommendations in The Natural Speller and he's ready to move on to Level A next year. He actually told me that spelling was his favorite subject this year! Seriously! I know!
My poor JPII roses are being consumed by thrips. Ugly brown petals! I've sprayed them before, but I wish I had a non-chemical solution. Any ideas?
So, we are enjoying some "summer time" right now, although, we are only taking a week off from math... then everyone starts Saxon. Whoo hoo!

25 comments:

  1. I'm enjoying all the hit and miss blog posts! So helpful! I nearly tried TT but am glad I didn't. We liked Apologia Anatomy but did have to adjust a bit, and are thinking about their Botany next year. I've heard Astronomy is the worst with YEC. And I've also heard that CHC has the best Catholic option for science. Phonetic Zoo didn't work well for us, but I'm glad to hear that others have liked it, especially since a friend might take my materials and try it with her kids. Thanks so much for sharing :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would definitely agree that the Astronomy was the worst. I can see why The Zoo wouldn't work for some kids. In fact, I was surprised that it worked for both of my girls who are slightly different learners. They had learned their phonics but just couldn't "see" the words the way my oldest natural born speller could. The drill formula worked for them I guess because it put the words in front of their eyes and in their hands over and over plus, they could each move at their own pace.

      Delete
  2. Dear Charlotte,
    thanks for your hits & misses. I like to hear what others have experienced-not the person who just bought the book a week ago. Re your roses i have had good luck w/ chilli pepper spray. It is time consuming to respray every time it rains, but its the best nonlethal (for the littlies) i have used.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the spray suggestion. I'm going to look it up.

      Delete
  3. I got tired of the Apologia series very quickly for the same reason! I didn't want to spend a ton of time "un-teaching" what they were learning! I finally went with the Harcourt Science which is secular, but I didn't find it offensive from a Catholic perspective. I thought it was pleasantly neutral. However, my daughter hated science and wasn't learning a thing no matter how hard I worked with her, and I finally borrowed, much against my will, the Abeka Science for 4th grade. She loved it, and learned to love science! Go figure.

    I used TT once for Geometry. I can teach algebra, but geometry is beyond me! When my son went to high school, I had him take the placement test to be sure he was up to par on geometry. He did fine, so he went ahead into Alg. II, but I was a bit worried at the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have heard from a reliable source that the Saxon geometry program is not their best. The original Saxon Algebra I, Algebra II, and Advanced Mathematics have enough Geometry incorporated in them to suffice.

      Delete
  4. With Apologia, I've found that the Chemistry and Physics texts written by Jay Wile are excellent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have heard good things about the books actually written by Mr. Wile however, I though he was no longer associated with the company.

      Delete
  5. I am stunned to hear you say that about TT, but not terribly surprised because after one year Faith slipped a grade. We did Saxon this year, too.

    I started Behold and See fifth grade this year and loved it. Very environmentally responsible. But by 2/3 through the year it was way over Faith's head. I should have known when my oldest said he was learning some of the same concepts in college classes! Take a good look at your book before you dive in. I don't know what we'll do next year. I switched to Exploring Creation Botany in March. I remember loving Seton's science -- esp the 8th grade Life Science. I think their seven is a delve into physics.

    Thanks for your post -- very helpful since Faith is on your girls' heels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My girls are going in to 7th and 8th grade next year. Do you think the 5th and 6th grade books would still be over their heads? The Professor used their Life Science book and thought it was so dull and dry that we dumped it. And he's my kids who loves science! He read my old college Astronomy text just for fun when he was in middle school.

      Delete
    2. I'll mail it to you for your perusal! I was impressed by "conservation of energy" and "bioaccumulation" but then we got into intro to biochemistry. Too much for fifth grade. I'm going to cover the weather chapter now but then I'll send it.

      My boys may have thought Life Science was boring, too (but they said that about a lot!), but I loved it. I guess it's not a pretty book, but good stuff. I might be a geek! ;-)

      Delete
  6. PS Try gardenrebel.com for your roses -- they offer many non-chemical recipes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love this review of hits and misses. These are definitely the most helpful kins of blog posts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Melanie! I am always so hesitant to write these posts because so much of why something doesn't work for us is our personal circumstance or a child's particular learning style or a mom's preferred teaching style... you know?

      Delete
  8. Thanks so much for your hits and misses post, I always love seeing these pop up towards the end of the school year! It is so helpful to read other mom's honest evaluations.

    ReplyDelete
  9. We dumped Apologia Science for the same reasons. My kids are enjoying CHC's Behold and See, especially the 5th grade book written by David Beresford. Regarding TT, we had the opposite experience. My eldest daughter did Saxon and bombed the SAT math the first time she took it. My younger kids are using TT and so far it seems to be working well for them. I think there is the tendency of busy moms to perhaps let the program do all the work. It's important to check the TT gradebook frequently (not just look at the scores, but go in and look at the problem history) and sometimes even be nearby so you can hear what's going on with their screen interaction. If the scores reflect they are missing problems (or skipping them) because they don't get a concept, sometimes I pull out supplemental materials (like the Key to... series) and have them concentrate on their weakness for awhile. My next daughter, gearing up for the SAT, found the SAT prep at Kahn Academy helpful. From my older kids' experience (two graduated from college this month - YEAH!!), I've finally come to grips with the fact that if a child is not mathematically inclined, there is no ideal program. He is going to struggle with anything. So you cover the basics, knowing he is not going to be engineer or scientist or using algebra to send rockets to space, and concentrate on developing his strengths and talents in other areas.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Katherine,
    I have only heard from a handful (as in I could count them on one hand) of people with your story, that their children actually improved on standardized testing after using TT. I'm not saying that Saxon is a good fit for everyone. I've heard a lot of people say it just doesn't work for them. My kid's scores in TT never led me to believe that they were skipping problems or missing concepts. In fact, just the opposite. Their final averages were all 90 and above but they failed the math test I gave them and they placed as much as two years behind grade level when I had them take placement tests for other math programs. That tells me that something just doesn't add up (pardon the pun).

    But, I completely agree with you that some kids are just not math inclined. I don't expect my kids to be math geniuses especially since neither my husband nor I are math inclined. We are much more "liberal arts" kind of people. But I would expect them to atleast be average and right now, using TT, they are well below average. One year of using Saxon, with my oldest son and he is back on grade level.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I want every little detail on high school. :) I'm so glad you are there ahead of me! ;) I have my eye on enrolling with MODG in high school... I just don't want the responsibility of transcripts. What's your plan for next year, since it sounds like Kolbe wasn't a good fit?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you for sharing your hits and misses. It is so helpful to hear.

    ReplyDelete
  13. We have enjoyed the Behold and See series (3rd grade was our least favorite). We are using the 5th grade book in 6th grade. He did find with it except for the chemistry chapter. I determined he would get this material in high school so we moved on and didn't try to get him to understand all of it. It was challenging though. I haven't decided if I will use them a year behind with my youngest, but it is highly likely.

    ReplyDelete
  14. That's too bad about the Professor! I still remember how disturbed I was reading Oedipus in (Catholic) high school. ugh. My girls read The Boys' and Girls' Herodotus (they fondly call it Herodotus for Babies) and all is well. Hooray for you changing up his curric to suit him so well. And congrats (to you both) on that Latin gold! Well done!

    ReplyDelete
  15. We skimmed through Apologia's Astronomy but it was a struggle. We turned to Noeo Science and CHC's Behold and See this year; with our 6th and 3rd doing the Noeo. So far it's been a great change.

    Apologia's Physical Science for high school was good. Our 10th grader used CHC's new biology for high school this past year. She ended up writing a blog for the high school biology student, because of the text.

    TT was a disappointment for our family early on. Sad because the kids really enjoyed the graphics.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I completely agree with everything you said about the Apologia texts! If it wasn't for skimming over some of the text when I read the books aloud to the kids, and the Journals and Lap Books we've made on each topic, I probably wouldn't have lasted as long either. I'm looking forward to our changes for next year, and definitively going to look a little closer at the Behold and See books as well.

    How did your girls like The Great Editing Adventure? My boys have neared the end of Fix-It! Level 1 and it is starting to get too difficult for them. I'm not sure now if I want to move them on to Level 2 next year, or wait until they are a little older and do some review this next year. The tutor recommended The Great Editing Adventure. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They liked it. It was easy and fun. I wrote the number of mistakes they were supposed to be looking for on each page so that they knew when they had found them all.

      Delete

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and yourself!